mustang 4.6 v8 0 100

Base-model Mustangs carry a 190-hp, 3.8-liter V-6 engine, while the GT gets a 4.6-liter single-overhead-cam V-8 rated at 260 hp. Either engine can team with a five-speed-manual transmission or an Though initially used in the 1994 and 1995 Mustang GTS, GT and Cobra, Ford retired the 302 cid pushrod small-block V8 after nearly 30 years of use, replacing it with the newer Modular 4.6 L (281 cu in) SOHC V8 in the 1996 Mustang GT. The 4.6 L V8 was initially rated at 215 bhp (160 kW), 1996–1997, but was later increased to 225 bhp (168 kW 19 in. x 9.0 in. 255/40R. P245/50R18 all-season. 225/45 front and rear. Back to the point at hand, The Mustang GT Convertible can hit 60 mph in 4.2 seconds before topping out at 155 mph. The four Mustang 4.6 V8 (1994 – 2005) Triton: 4.7: 8 000 km/ 12 months: Mustang 4.6 V8 (2005 – 2007) (280 ci) 5.7: 8 000 km/ 12 months: Mustang 4.6 V8 (2008 – 2011) (280 ci) 5.7: 8 000 km/ 12 months: Mustang 5.0 LX, GT (1986 – 1992) 4.7 / 0.9: 12 000 km/ 6 months: Mustang GT 5.0 V8 (2011 – 2011) Ti-VCT: 7.6: 10 000 miles/ 12 months: Mustang GT new v6= 210hp. old 4.6=225hp. 99-04 4.6= 260hp. 05+ 4.6=305hp. not even the new 4.6's are worth it. you could swap in the 4.6 and someone else can use the same money for a power adder on the v6 and pull ya all day. for the money spent on the swap ud have a way slower car than if you used the money on your v6. nonton film dilan 1990 full movie indoxxi. The Mustang i V8 GT (304 Hp) produced by Ford comes with a 4606 cm3 Petrol (Gasoline) A-95 engine producing 304 HPW. The model was launched in production in year 2004 and stopped production in 2009. Top speed for Ford Mustang V i V8 GT (304 Hp) is 240 km/h and it takes n/a seconds to reach 100 km/h from a standstill. Check below technical details and specifications for the Ford Mustang V i V8 GT (304 Hp): Performance Engine i V8 GT (304 Hp) Power 304 HPW Maximum Speed 240 km/h 0-100 Km/h acceleration n/a Fuel Consumption Urban n/a Fuel Consumption Extra-Urban n/a Fuel Consumption Combined n/a Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline) A-95 Weight n/a kg Emission Standard n/a Manual Gearbox (# gears) 5 Automatic Gearbox (# gears) 5 Car Parts Find and order various car parts for the Ford Mustang V i V8 GT (304 Hp): Tires Wheel Rims Suspensions Body Parts Lubricant Oil Injectors Turbine Windshield Light Bulbs General Details Car Brand Ford Model Mustang Generation Mustang V Body Type Coupe Number of Doors 2 Seats 4 Dimensions, Weights, Volumes Length 4775 mm Width 1877 mm Height 1407 mm Weight n/a kg Maximum Weight n/a kg Wheel Base 2720 mm Front Track 1592 mm Rear Track 1588 mm Clearance 100 mm Fuel Tank Capacity 61 liters Maximum Luggage Volume 340 l Minimum Luggage Volume n/a l Engine Engine Position Front, lengthwise Engine Volume 4606 cm3 Fuel System Multi-point injection Turbine n/a Torque 427/4500 Nm Maximum Power In 6000 rpm Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline) A-95 Number of Cylinders 8 Position of Cylinders V engine Diameter of Cylinders mm Stroke in the Cylinder 90 mm Compression Ratio Number of Valves per Cylinder 3 Valvetrain n/a Engine Model n/a Wheels & Brakes Wheel Drive Rear ABS Yes Steering Type Steering rack Power Steering Hydraulic Steering Front Brakes Disc Rear Brakes Ventilated discs Front Suspension Independent, spring Rear Suspension Independent, spring Tire Size 235/55 R17 Wheel Rims Size 8J x 17 Turning Diameter n/a Ford Mustang V i V8 GT (304 Hp) Images There is a good range of Ford images on Google – CLIKC HERE for Ford Mustang V images. The data for Ford Mustang V i V8 GT (304 Hp) presented above may contain errors. does not take any responsibility for any inaccuracies. We are always looking to improve our car database, so if you identify any incorrect details, please get in touch with us. The Ford V8 engine, the first member of Ford's Modular overhead camshaft engine family in the production, was introduced in the 1991 Lincoln Town Car. It was a 90-degree V-angle eight-cylinder gasoline engine with two valves per cylinder and SOHC design. Later, this engine became the base V8 in the Mustang GT. Ford also has been produced a 4-valve DOHC version well known by SVT Cobra and Mach 1 applications. This 32-valve DOHC engine debuted in the 1993 Lincoln Mark VIII under name of Four-Cam V8. The new Modular V8 series replaced its pushrod-based predecessor - Ford's Small Block engine. Ford's V8 has a deep-skirt aluminum or cast iron cylinder block (Romeo and Windsor castings), depending on model year and application. While Windsor iron blocks have "W" letter and dowel pins at the cross-bolted main caps, Romeo iron blocks have jackscrew cross-bolted main caps and are identified by "R" (but not all of them). Otherwise, they look the same. Aluminum cylinder blocks were cast at the Windsor Aluminum Plant (WAP) by the exception of older 90s Teksid blocks, which were cast in Turin, Italy. Aluminum blocks came with 6-bolt main bearing caps. The angle between cylinder banks is 90 degrees. Deck height is in ( mm), and cylinder bore spacing measures in ( mm). The engine block features a nearly 1:1 bore-to-stroke ratio (square configuration) that positively affecting on its noise, harshness, and vibration characteristics. Connecting rod length is in ( mm). Modular engines were equipped with six- or eight-bolt crankshafts. Eight-bolt steel crankshaft was used in truck and high-performance applications, while six-bolt crankshafts usually were fitted in Romeo blocks under the hoods of passenger cars. All engines came with forged pistons and cracked powdered metal connecting rods from the factory. The engine can be fitted with three types of aluminum cylinder heads: 2- valve (1990-2014) and 3-valve (2005-2010) with single overhead camshaft (SOHC) valvetrain and 4-valve with dual-overhead-camshaft configuration. Single camshafts, as well as individual intake and exhaust camshafts in the four-valve version, are driven by two timing chains (by one for each head). Valvetrain for all of them features low-friction roller rocker arms and hydraulic lash adjusters. The 3-valve cylinder head features apex-shaped combustion chambers with a centralized spark plug, two intake valves, and one large exhaust valve designed to improve velocity and volume. 3V SOHC engines also were equipped with Ford's variable camshaft timing (VCT) system. Ford 2v/3v engines feature the intake manifold made of composite material. All 32-valve DOHC engines had aluminum blocks only (except 2003-2004SVT Cobra, which had an iron block with 4-bolt main bearing caps). Each cylinder has two intake and two exhaust valves. The 1993-1998 four-valve heads feature individual intake port for each intake valve (split-port design). In 1999, cylinder heads were revised, and engineers implemented tumble-style intake ports where one intake port feeds two intake valves. In that year, they also replaced the variable runner-length intake manifold by a fixed runner-length intake manifold and changed camshaft profiles. Modular V8s had a traditional sequential multi-port fuel injection system controlled by ECU and mechanical/electronic throttle body. They also fitted with an electronically controlled, individual coil-on-plug ignition system. The 4-valve V8 engine featured on Ward's 10 Best Engines List for 1996 and 1997 years, while the 3-valve version was on the list for 2005-2008 and received a variety of accolades. Using this engine as a base, Ford developed a bigger engine series, which also gained good success in sales. The production of the Modular engine was discontinued in 2014. The last engine of the line was a 2v engine for a 2014 model year Ford E-Series van. By that time, the new Modular Coyote engine, its successor, already had been produced for 3 years. Engine Specs Manufacturer Romeo Engine Plant in Romeo, Michigan;Windsor Engine Plant in Windsor, Ontario;Essex Engine Plant in Windsor, Ontario Production years 1991-2014 Cylinder block material Aluminum, Cast iron Cylinder head material Aluminum Fuel system Sequential multi-port fuel injection Valves per cylinder 2/3/4 Valvetrain layout SOHC/DOHC Bore, mm mm ( in) Stroke, mm mm ( in) Displacement, cc 4,601 cc ( cu in) Type of internal combustion engine Four-stroke, naturally aspirated/supercharged Compression Ratio - 1990-2000 SOHC 2-valve engine; - 2000+ SOHC 2-valve engine; - SOHC 3-valve engine; - 1996-1998 Power, hp 190-260 hp (142-194 kW)/4,400-4,750 - 2-valve SOHC;292-315 hp (218-235 kW) - 3-valve SOHC;280-390 hp (209-291 kW) - 4-valve DOHC Torque, lb ft 260-302 ft-lb (353-409 Nm)/3,250-4,000 - 2-valve SOHC;315-325 ft-lb (427-441 Nm) - 3-valve SOHC;265-452 ft-lb (359-613 Nm) - 4-valve DOHC Firing order 1-3-7-2-6-5-4-8 Engine oil weight SAE 5W-20 Engine oil capacity, liter l ( with oil filter Oil change interval, mile 5,000 (10,000 km)/6 months Applications 2V: Lincoln Town Car (Touring Sedan), Ford F-Series, Ford E-Series, Ford Mustang GT, Ford Crown Victoria, Ford Thunderbird, Ford Explorer, Mercury Mountaineer, Mercury Grand Marquis, Mercury Cougar, MG ZT 260, Rover 75 V8, Mobility Ventures MV-1. 3V: Ford Mustang GT, Ford Mustang Bullitt, Ford Explorer Sport Trac, Ford Explorer, Ford F-Series, Mercury Mountaineer. 4V: Ford Mustang SVT Cobra, Ford Mustang Mach 1, Lincoln Mark VIII, Lincoln Continental, Lincoln Aviator, Mercury Marauder, Marcos Mantis (GT), Panoz AIV Roadster, Panoz Esperante, MG X-Power SV, Koenigsegg CC8S, Koenigsegg CCR V8. Ford V8 Modular Engine Problems and Reliability Ford's Modular V8 has earned a highly positive reputation amongst owners in terms of reliability and longevity. The engine can easily run well over 200,000 miles. Some taxi services used Crown Victorias with V8 until impressive 300,000 or even 400,000 miles. But of course, ideal engines do not exist, and this engine has several common problems and designed flaws that currently are widely known. The first widespread problem is plastic intake manifold cracking. This problem can be found in SOHC 2-valve engines produced from 1996 to 2001. In that period, Ford used a nylon composite intake manifold manufactured by DuPont, this manifold was prone to failure without any warning or sign. The reason is the intake manifold could not handle stress on the material caused by thousands of heat/cool cycles (expansion and contraction) and additional forces/vibrations coming from the alternator bracket mounted right into the plastic. As a result, this manifold can crack and split, the heater hose and coolant temperature sensor can loosen, which would result in an engine coolant leak and vehicle overheating. Late in 2001, Ford replaced the all-plastic manifold with a revised intake manifold that uses cast aluminum at the failure points. A short thread depth in the aluminum cylinder heads is the root of the second common problem - stripping of cylinder head spark plug threads. Be careful while changing spark plugs on any Ford V8s, as it is so easy to over-torque them and striping threads. Ford recommends a threaded insert as the method to repair stripped thread and even provides a tool kit specifically for that. There’s definitely something about the Ford Mustang. Since the launch of the current – sixth – generation of the model in 2015, more than 3 650 units, accounting for 87% market share, have found homes in South Africa. That is quite a feat. Initially, the Mustang was launched locally in the Ecoboost and the burly V8. Thankfully, the marque has come to its senses and stopped importing the former. One of the primary reasons you would buy a Mustang, besides its looks and heritage, is the V8 engine nestling under the bonnet and the glorious noise it makes. I mean, who wants a paltry four-cylinder engine in their Mustang? It is the culinary equivalent of going to a revered steakhouse and ordering a lentil soup – it’s sacrilegious. To keep the model relevant and on people’s buying lists, special edition Mustangs have made landfall in recent years. Among these is the characterful Bullit version which was exclusively offered with British Racing Green paintwork and manual transmission. Only 55 units were brought into SA, so if you can find one, hang on to it as it is likely to appreciate in value. In June last year, another limited edition model – 100 units – of the Mustang Mach 1 was launched here. It boasts a signature off-grey lick of paint with contrasting black-and-orange colour inserts. The interior of the Mustang California Special Most recently, Ford has brought us yet another limited version of the Pony in the form of the California Special (GT/CS) and, again, only 100 units are coming to SA. It pays homage to the original 1964 California Special and can be distinguished by its blacked-out grille, GT performance wing on the rear deck and side-scoops which, sadly, are ornamental and not functional. The cabin too is full of special edition items such as the CS name embroidered in the seats, while a California Special insert/plaque nestles on the drop-down fascia on the passenger side. Under the bonnet still beats the heart of the Coyote V8 engine making 330kW and 528Nm via a 10-speed automatic gearbox driving the rear wheels. It might not be the first word in blistering performance, but what the Mustang lacks in outright performance, it more than makes up for in character. There are many, more powerful and more expensive sports cars on the market, but very few have the alluring and enigmatic character of the Mustang. Pass by a school in a Mustang and kids point and shout in awe, something a ‘Stang musters more easily than any other car in its price range. (John McCann/M&G) Driving a Mustang fast is like riding a bucking bronco – it requires some deftness as it is not the sharpest sports car in the segment, yet there’s still something satisfying about doing so. Perhaps it has to do with raucous V8 sound from its quad exhausts, which is as old-school as modern V8s go. It also comes with a LDS (limited slip differential) to ensure maximum grip levels off the line and out of tight corners. Of course, you can switch off all the nanny electronics and drive it like an absolute yobo, leaving unofficial black road markings in your tyres’ wake. It is these nuances that continue to make the Mustang one of the coolest cars available on the market. It is not the best built, the most dynamic or the fastest, yet people continue to buy them in their droves. It is quite an enigma, the Ford Mustang and that, perhaps, remains its strongest suit. Pricing: R1 154 900 and all 100 units have already been pre-sold. Greg Pajo and FordCar and Driver Over the years, we've tested a plethora of American muscle cars and have been there for each drastic refinement since the 1960s. Straight-line speed is one obvious improvement. And it's unfair to describe muscle cars as one-trick ponies, as they've started carving up corners at speeds unthought of even 10 years ago. Especially because some of today's Mustangs are fully-electric. But, if you're looking at a benchmark that accurately reflects how much a single model, such as the Ford Mustang, has improved over the past few years, you can't go wrong with the old-fashioned zero-to-60-mph time*. It's easily relatable and comparable, unlike a skid pad number or a Nürburgring lap time. Thanks to our extensive history of gathering our own performance data, we have decades of revealing numbers captured by our editorial staff that not only offer a unique look into a vehicle's evolution but also serve as a performance barometer of sorts for any given era. Jump in and flip through more than five decades of Mustang acceleration numbers pulled from some of the hottest (and not so hot) performance ponies ever strapped with C/D test equipment.*Acceleration times using 3-mph rollout, not our current rollout standard of 1 foot with the exception 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 and newer. Ford Mustang Convertible: seconds It’s easily the best thing to come out of Dearborn since the 1932 V-8 Model B roadster. But for all Ford’s talk of Total Performance, it’s still clear that the Mustang has been designed and built to a price. The necessity of meeting cost goals meant that it had to share a maximum number of components with other models in the Ford line. Out of this situation sprang the advantage of an extremely wide availability of options for the Mustang, selected from the Falcon, Fairlane, and Galaxie MUSTANG CONVERTIBLE TEST 1967 Ford Mustang GT : seconds You’d think that dropping an anchor like the 390 engine into the Mustang would overload the front end and make it handle like a real dog, wouldn’t you? The puristi will glance at the specs and hoot derisively at the percent weight distribution and tell you the rig will never fly, right? In truth, even we expected the Mustang 390 GT to plow like an Ohio farmer. It doesn’t. The car we tested had over 400 pounds more weight on the front wheels than the last Mustang we tested—a 271-hp 289. There have been no basic changes in the Falcon-inherited suspension, yet the Mustang 390 GT has balance and handling. FULL MUSTANG GT TEST 1968 Ford Mustang Coupe: seconds The Mustang engine was all business. No chrome air cleaner or valve covers. Just plain old blue paint. Even the headers were kind of pale blue. Right on top was a super-tall aluminum, two 4-barrel inline intake manifold with a pair of 540-cfm Holleys and a paper-element air cleaner. There it was, tunnel-port fans, right in front of our very eyes. The real thing. “Well, yes, this is your regular to 1 compression ratio, dry-deck, tunnel-port 302,” allowed Ford Man, still a bit defensive from the tire discussion. “How many do ya want?” FULL MUSTANG TEST 1969 Ford Mustang Mach I: seconds It may just be that this time the stylists have done too good a job. Look at the Mustang Mach I, and you expect miracles—drive it, and they are not forthcoming. The pieces are there—most of them anyway—but the sum is far short of its parts. FULL MUSTANG MACH I TEST 1971 Ford Mustang Boss 351: seconds To race or not to race? Ford has finally decided. Not to. With all the pressure from ecologists and auto-safety advocates, Ford was finding it impossible to justify dropping four or five million at the tracks every year where people could see it. So no more racing. That sort of leaves the Boss 351 dangling from the end of the limb that has been cut off. The main purpose of its existence has been to fulfill the SCCA production requirement so that the factory racers would have something from which to build a juggernaut for the Trans-Am. But if the factory isn’t going to race them, who will? FULL MUSTANG BOSS 351 TEST 1974 Ford Mustang II Mach I: seconds While the Mustang II shares some standard compo­nents with the Pinto, it is not just another version of that econ­omy sedan—no more than the original Mustang was simply a Falcon. It has been built with the specific intention of coming into the market as a Super Coupe and, in terms of “feel,” it’s a success. As opposed to the sterile practicality and cost-trimming measures so dispassionately evident in American-made economy cars up to this time, the Mustang II in no way seems to be a cheap car. FULL MUSTANG II MACH I TEST 1976 Ford Mustang II Cobra II: seconds You can’t deny its initial appeal—a glorious sobriquet from the past, Carroll Shelby paint job, scoops, spoilers, white-letter tires, V-8 motor, and four on the floor. Sounds neat, but what you get is a mini Mark IV all dressed up in performance gear with nothing to make it go. Your mother-in-law deserves more than mph. To strangle a 302-cubic-inch motor down to a sickly 134 horsepower is an amazing—but embarrassing—feat of modern technology. FULL MUSTANG COBRA II TEST 1980 Ford Mustang Cobra: seconds First the bad news: The big motor’s gone. We say “big” with tongue firmly planted in cheek, because 1979’s 302-cubic-inch V-8 sucking life through a two-barrel straw was hardly what you’d call muscle bound. Nevertheless, this year’s plan is a smaller cylinder bore and less displacement to wring one more mile out of every precious gallon of gas. The new, 255-cubic-inch (4810 cc) V-8 also trims 25 pounds off front-end weight. What this costs you is roughly 10 horsepower compared with the 302 V-8’s 140 net horsepower output. Ford claims the change brings a fuel-economy improvement of mpg. FULL MUSTANG COBRA TEST HERE 1982 Ford Mustang GT: seconds Press on the Mustang’s gas pedal, and great things happen. An authoritative growl from under the hood is accompanied by screeches of rubber at the back of the car. This Mustang is at the moment the quickest machine made in America, and our internal sources at the Ford Motor Company suggest that efforts are afoot to keep Mustangs and Capris that way. FULL MUSTANG GT TEST HERE 1983 Ford Mustang GT: seconds The third-gen Mustang GT marked the start of a long climb out of the Dark Ages for American carmakers. Two oil shortages in the previous 10 years and the ratcheting up of emissions standards had diverted engineering resources into building smaller, more efficient cars. By 1983, though, the Camaro/Mustang performance race was on again. That rivalry was, like now, about more than just straight-line speed, so Ford also retuned the ’83 GT’s suspension for better handling and widened its Michelin TRX rubber for more grip. FULL MUSTANG GT TEST HERE 1996 Ford Mustang GT: seconds Now that the year-old redesign of the Ford Mustang has some miles on it, both Ford and the Mustang’s obsessed clientele are ready for a few important changes. A Mustang Cobra making more than 300 horsepower is certainly welcome. And finally banished from the ’96 Mustang GT is the ancient overhead-valve V-8, which—in various guises—has powered Mustangs since their inception. Certain purists may wail and gnash their teeth over this one, but it’s a transition we like. FULL MUSTANG GT TEST HERE 1999 Ford Mustang SVT Cobra: seconds Who ever thought a factory Mustang would command a price of $28,000? More surprising, who could have imagined that a Mustang would have an independent rear suspension? Well, the 1999 SVT Mustang Cobra lays claim to both those surprises and makes a strong case that the latter (abetted by a new 320-horsepower version of the four-cam, aluminum-block V-8) justifies the former. FULL MUSTANG SVT COBRA TEST HERE 2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1: seconds The Mach 1 earns its silver medal because it is brute fun. Drop the hammer, and with no especially refined technique, 60 mph is yours in a scalding seconds, just second behind a $34,750 SVT Cobra and the fastest time in this test by a full half-second. The first two shifts of the notchy box leave skid marks, and the fourth shift puts paid to 151 mph. FULL MUSTANG MACH 1 TEST HERE 2005 Ford Mustang GT: seconds It doesn’t happen often, but the hens in the henhouse sometimes kill the fox. That’s apparently what happened over at Henry’s glass henhouse in Dearborn. The GT’s SOHC modular V-8 now features 24 valves rather than 16. The three-valve heads permit an increase of 40 horses and 18 pound-feet of torque, although both improvements are realized at loftier revolutions. FULL MUSTANG GT TEST HERE 2010 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500: seconds Remember when 540 horses were enough to win Indy or set a Bonneville record? The Shelby lunges forward with a fearsome roar when you mash it, the acceleration making you startlingly heavy in the seat. Even so, Ford thought our quarter-mile was slow by a half-second, but after two test sessions in imperfect conditions—and after letting Ford’s own hot shoe take the wheel—we were unable to better the times. Ford figures the car should run quarters, maybe quicker. Maybe so—we await the proof. Meanwhile, it’s no quicker than a Chevy Camaro SS, which is about $17,000 cheaper. FULL MUSTANG GT500 TEST HERE 2011 Ford Mustang GT: seconds The 412 horsepower and 390 lb-ft of torque, the latter on a gloriously flat curve that peaks at 4250 rpm, are achievements. It’s enough to knock out a 60-mph sprint in seconds, and the quarter-mile in seconds at 109 mph, which are more or less Camaro SS times. Finally, a Mustang engine that doesn’t have to eat dust from a small-block. FULL MUSTANG GT TEST HERE 2013 Ford Mustang Boss 302 Laguna Seca: seconds Two. That’s how many times this author looked underneath the 2013 Boss 302 Laguna Seca to make sure some crafty Ford employee hadn’t replaced the solid axle with a fancy-pants independent-rear-suspension setup. It’s not as if the Boss were suddenly devoid of axle hop or radically more skilled at navigating off-camber curves and uneven pavement than are other current Mustangs, but Ford has finessed the stick axle to the point where it no longer spoils an otherwise good time. Still, we wanted to be 100 percent sure the company hadn’t slipped us a ringer. FULL MUSTANG BOSS 302 TEST HERE 2013 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500: seconds With a car like this, you inevitably focus on the numbers. The $54,995 GT500 coupe turns in a zero-to-60-mph sprint of seconds. Ferociously tall gearing means third gear is good for 140 mph and first gear is long enough to reach highway speeds. Even so, the quarter-mile passes in seconds. Slam a redline shift from second to third, and you’ll hear the rear tires chirp. We also saw an even g on the skidpad. FULL MUSTANG GT500 TEST HERE 2015 Ford Mustang GT: seconds With a six-speed manual sprouting up between the seats, the V-8 makes very short work of the first three gears. The accelerative rush is such that the somewhat cheesy Ground Speed label on the speedometer makes some sense, and the needle swings into triple digits very quickly. Zero to 60 mph is accomplished in seconds, and the quarter-mile lights tripped in 13 flat; our Mustang also hit 150 mph in well under 30 seconds. Also, there’s no Muzak version of the Daytona 500 played through the speakers in the Mustang. The GT’s V-8 soundtrack, although more subdued than we expected, is generated solely by combustion events and not electrons. We came away from this hushed GT thinking about refinement, not tinnitus. FULL MUSTANG GT TEST HERE 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 / GT350R: / seconds Not that the new Shelby isn’t quick, but it’s not a dedicated quarter-mile eater, either. The base GT350 reaches 60 mph in seconds after a somewhat difficult launch and does the quarter-mile in seconds at 117 mph. Perhaps not stunning numbers these days, but the test car did weigh 3796 pounds. With its 18-pound carbon-fiber wheels and stickier Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires, the R (at 3710 pounds) makes it to 60 in seconds and through the quarter-mile in seconds at 119 mph. Guess what? Porsche 911 GT3 drivers don’t jump up and down about drag-strip times. Stats that matter to them more are skidpad grip and braking distances. There, the 350 and 350R pull g and a startling g, while stopping from 70 mph in 152 feet and 146 feet. Ford’s priorities become clear when you check the track-sheet data. FULL MUSTANG GT350 TEST HERE 2018 Ford Mustang EcoBoost: seconds The Ford Mustang's punchy turbocharged inline-four EcoBoost engine was available with its own Performance Pack for the 2018 model year, and like today, comes with a 10-speed automatic. If you recall, the last EcoBoost we tested was a 2015 example that had four fewer gears to mess around with. The extra speeds help in a straight line, as the 2018 EcoBoost goes from zero to 60 mph in seconds flat. That's an improvement of seconds over the 2015 model. FULL MUSTANG ECOBOOST TEST HERE 2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt: seconds We've been in love with the Ford Mustang Bullitt since we first saw it on screen with Steve McQueen. Instead of making us pine for our own, Ford sent one for a 40,000-mile long term test, and we recently got our car out to the test track. It makes good use of its 480 horsepower on the way to 60 mph in seconds. It's slower than the less powerful GT to 60 mph because the Bullitt comes with a sweet manual transmission with a cue-ball shifter, a concession that's worth the half-second loss. FULL MUSTANG BULLITT TEST HERE 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500: seconds 2021 Ford Mustang Mach 1: seconds A 480-hp all-motor throwback, the Ford Mustang Mach 1 is what's leftover now that the Bullitt and Shelby GT350 have been discontinued. The Mach 1 has 20-hp more than the standard Mustang GT, uses the six-speed manual transmission from the GT350, but will also offer a 10-speed automatic. Our test car used the proper six-speed, and sticky Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires for a acceleration run to 60 mph. Although not as quick as the GT Performance Package 2 or GT350, the Mach 1 trailed behind by only a couple tenths of a second. FULL MACH 1 TEST RESULTS 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E: seconds Fords use of the Mustang name for its all-electric crossover was controversial. The dual-motor Mach-E we tested has 346-hp, but unlike previous Mustangs, you can't hear any of it. It tipped the scales at 4856 pounds; the heaviest Mustang ever. It's to 60 mph beats the 300-hp fifth-gen Mustang GT and went from 50–70 mph in just seconds. We managed 350 miles of highway range in this all-wheel-drive Mustang, and whether you agree with the name or not, saddle up because the Mach-E won our EV of the Year award for 2021. FULL MACH-E TEST RESULTS A Brief History in Zero-to-60-MPH for the Chevrolet Corvette This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at

mustang 4.6 v8 0 100